LIBERAL OBSTRUCTIONISTS

This article is fairly serious for this site but I need to get something off of my chest. This article is named "Liberal Obstructionists". I was inspired to write this after reading about the ongoing fight in Congress over the nomination of John Bolton as the our UN ambassador. The Dumbocrats have so far stalled having a vote on this nominee because they know that he will win the vote. You may ask, How can these fucks do this? I will tell you, they are threatening the filibuster against him. A filibuster is where one Senator speaks about any issue until the session is over and therefore stalling the vote indefinitely. This process has been used by both parties sparingly in the past and generally it was warranted. The modern Dumbocratic party, reeling from its inability to stop the erosion of its influence in both houses of Congress, has decided that the only way that they can have any impact is to merely obstruct the legislative process. They have filibustered most of President Bush's nominees for the judicial branch and many judicial seats go on empty because of it. You may have read about the "nuclear" option being thrown around by Senate Leader Frist. This involves stopping the filibuster process by changing Senate rules to prevent judicial filibusters. This must be done immediately. Most experts believe that Senate Republicans will not vote against it because of the fear of being seen as a traitor by the grass roots of the party. President Bush enjoys a 90+% approval rating among registered Republicans (higher than even the late, great Ronald Reagan) and to oppose him could equal political suicide for a Republican.

The idiot liberals are doing this for only one reason. They realize that they are no longer a threat to the GOP and the only way they can legislate is through activist liberal judges that make defacto laws with judicial precedent. See Roe v. Wade or gay marriage rulings in the Northeast and West coast. These rulings are difficult to overturn and therefore basically become laws. Of course, this is not what the Founding Fathers had in mind when designing the structure of our government. The judicial branch is only supposed to interpret the Constitution not make rulings that are personally acceptable. The judges are in clear violation of the Constitution and should be removed from the bench.

John Bolton is the main reason for this article. He has worked in many branches of the government and has been an important figure in the creation of modern American foreign policy. I will not bore you with the details of his service but I will say this, this man has been a staunch defender of our nation's interests abroad. The reason for the opposition from the liberals is this man's disdain for the UN in its current state. We, as Americans, have to remember that we created the UN and we should do whatever necessary to make the UN a subservient organization. I personally support immediate unilateral withdrawal from the UN but in the modern political environment this may not be possible. John Bolton is a reformer and would finally provide the United States an ambassador that is not afraid to question the rampant idiocy and liberalism at the UN. Liberals (limp-wristed pussies) do not want to offend the other nations within the UN so the nomination of Bolton, to them, seems to be an insult to the UN. I say fuck the UN and fuck the liberal idiots who get in the way of the Bush agenda. Just remember this, when Frist is President in 2008 and we have a larger margin in both houses of Congress there will nothing that the Dumbocrats can do to impede the agenda of the all-knowing GOP. I know that most of you idiots have no clue who your Senator is but if for some odd reason you do, call them and tell them to get rid of the judicial filibuster and stop getting in the way of George the Great!! Long live the GOP!!!!

-arthur@arthurshall.com